SOVEREIGN AUSTRALIA COMPARE — HOMELESSNESS

HOMELESSNESS — WHERE THE PARTIES STAND

The approach, the exit into a rental, crisis housing and what is measured — five parties, from platforms, releases and funding agreements, with the check date on the table. The Sovereign Australia column restates the published policy: Housing First funded in every major city and regional centre, a Commonwealth bond guarantee for people exiting homelessness, and healing towns for the most complex cases.

Checked 27 August 2026. Sources: party platforms and releases; the National Agreement on Social Housing and Homelessness; Treasury and ministerial announcements to August 2026 including the 13 August crisis-housing package; the Greens’ costed homelessness plans; One Nation’s published statements; Sovereign Australia’s platform. “No policy published” means none found on the public record, not indifference. One Nation’s positions are drawn from speeches and Senate interventions rather than a published platform. This table states each party’s position, not this party’s characterisation of it.

IssueSovereign AustraliaLaborCoalitionGreensOne Nation
The approach
State + Federal
Housing First, funded in every major city and regional centre: stable housing first, then the issues that led to it — the reverse does not work. Supply built underneath it through Community Towns and commercial conversion. The $9.3 billion National Agreement on Social Housing and Homelessness with the states, including $400 million a year dedicated to homelessness, inside the 55,000 social and affordable homes commitment. No dedicated homelessness policy published; its housing response centres on land supply, planning approvals and superannuation access for deposits. End homelessness: 50,000 ongoing Housing First supportive tenancies — 20,000 for at-risk youth — 40 supportive accommodation buildings on the Common Ground model, and a $550 million a year boost to services. No dedicated homelessness program published; attributes the crisis to migration-driven demand and would cut it, with GST off building materials to lift supply.
Exiting homelessness into a rental
Federal
A Commonwealth housing bond guarantee: for people exiting homelessness into private rental, the Commonwealth guarantees the first six months of rent to the landlord — removing the no-rental-history barrier. Commonwealth Rent Assistance increased in successive budgets; renters’ rights pursued through National Cabinet agreements with the states. No policy published on the rental exit. Public and community housing rent capped at 25 per cent of household income; well-resourced casework support. Allow home owners to rent rooms in their primary residence tax free, and free up granny flats for tenants other than family.
Crisis housing and family violence
Federal
Crisis response built on the same Housing First footing; the most complex cases — severe addiction, severe mental illness, long-term homelessness — housed in healing towns along the corridors rather than cycled through city emergency accommodation. Over $1.2 billion in crisis and transitional housing investment — including $308 million announced in August 2026 for 448 new homes supporting more than 22,000 women and children escaping family violence. No separate policy published. Well-resourced crisis and transitional accommodation with priority for women and children affected by family violence, First Nations people and young people. No separate policy published.
What is measured
Federal
The homelessness rate published as a standing metric on the People’s Portal — a number every government is evaluated against, updated as the data updates. Census counts and AIHW specialist-services reporting; no standing public metric committed. No measurement commitment published. No measurement commitment published. No measurement commitment published.

Where our column comes from

Every Sovereign Australia cell restates the published policy — the Housing First, bond-guarantee and healing-town commitments in the platform, and the supply framework in the housing memos (the housing crisis, Rural Communities, City Communities). One convergence is stated plainly: both this party and the Greens cite the Housing First evidence; the difference is the supply system built underneath it and the corridor healing towns for the most complex cases.